Is your peer review system still worth it?

Your perspective on using the present peer review system is invaluable input . Is your peer review system worth it to work with? To pay for?

What to do about overdues?

Review the tools available to the editorial office administrator to meet the target manuscript processing time

Update Reviewer Profile Info

How often does your journal ask reviewers update their profile information? How does this serve both the journal and the reviewers?

Optimize database performance by merging duplicate accounts

Don’t ignore those alerts! Merge duplicate accounts regularly to optimizes database performance.

The fine art of journal workflow management

Ensure your peer review system is properly configured for your unique journal workflow to keep things running smoothly.

The Efficient Peer Review Journal

What can you do as a journal administrator to make the peer review and editorial process more efficient?

Configurability is key for peer review software

All about why configurability is key when choosing your submission, peer review and editorial management software.

Peer Review System Trial: 30 days, risk-free 

A 30 day risk-free evaluation of submission/ editorial workflow management/ peer review software. The best basis for your decision.

Introducing Scite manuscript reference checker

Introducing Scite.ai: scite is a powerful citation and reference checker tool integrated into Manuscript Manager peer review software

Introducing Active Author Guidelines

Presenting our machine-learning, author-facing manuscript pre-checker helping authors and editorial office

Blog

We are all about online peer review.
Follow our peer review blog to stay on top of best practices, trends and much more.

Is your peer review system still worth it?

Is your peer review system still worth it?

Your perspective on using the present peer review system is invaluable input . Is your peer review system worth it to work with? To pay for?
Read More
What to do about overdues?

What to do about overdues?

Review the tools available to the editorial office administrator to meet the target manuscript processing time
Read More
Update Reviewer Profile Info

Update Reviewer Profile Info

How often does your journal ask reviewers update their profile information? How does this serve both the journal and the reviewers?
Read More
Optimize database performance by merging duplicate accounts

Optimize database performance by merging duplicate accounts

Don't ignore those alerts! Merge duplicate accounts regularly to optimizes database performance.
Read More
The fine art of journal workflow management

The fine art of journal workflow management

Ensure your peer review system is properly configured for your unique journal workflow to keep things running smoothly.
Read More
The Efficient Peer Review Journal

The Efficient Peer Review Journal

What can you do as a journal administrator to make the peer review and editorial process more efficient?
Read More
Configurability is key for peer review software

Configurability is key for peer review software

All about why configurability is key when choosing your submission, peer review and editorial management software.
Read More
Peer Review System Trial: 30 days, risk-free 

Peer Review System Trial: 30 days, risk-free 

A 30 day risk-free evaluation of submission/ editorial workflow management/ peer review software. The best basis for your decision.
Read More
Introducing Scite manuscript reference checker

Introducing Scite manuscript reference checker

Introducing Scite.ai: scite is a powerful citation and reference checker tool integrated into Manuscript Manager peer review software
Read More
Introducing Active Author Guidelines

Introducing Active Author Guidelines

Presenting our machine-learning, author-facing manuscript pre-checker helping authors and editorial office
Read More
Applications to the Benzon Foundation

Applications to the Benzon Foundation

Applications management for grants, scholarships, funding with Manuscript Manager. Example? The Benzon Foundation!
Read More
Phd applications at SDU

Phd applications at SDU

Process your PhD applications efficiently with Manuscript Manager, the configurable editorial management system
Read More
The Reviewer experience

The Reviewer experience

Peer reviewers are 'users' too, and need a good user experience. How to keep evaluations simple to ensure future contribution.
Read More
Registering areas of expertise

Registering areas of expertise

Registering external reviewers' areas of expertise with keywords and descriptions provides key information for your database
Read More
Checking for plagiarism

Checking for plagiarism

Plagiarism vs. simiilarity: considerations when checking academic journal manuscripts
Read More
Inviting external reviewers

Inviting external reviewers

How many external reviewers should be invited to review a manuscript and when? Is there an industry norm or recommended strategy?
Read More
Your Journal’s Review Time

Your Journal’s Review Time

Setting review time for academic journal peer review. What timeframe is advisable? Do shorter review times yield results?
Read More
Should your peer review move online?

Should your peer review move online?

What are the benefits of an online submission, editorial management and peer review system? Does conversion make sense?
Read More
Confidentiality: which level is right?

Confidentiality: which level is right?

Reviewer Confidentiality: Single Blind, Double Blind or Open? How do peer reviewed journals decide? Pros and Cons.
Read More
The “just right” number of co-editors

The “just right” number of co-editors

Co-Editors: What number of co-editors is "just right" for your peer reviewed journal? How to determine the number of co-editors
Read More
The Creation of an online peer review platform

The Creation of an online peer review platform

Online peer-review platform developed for and by academic journal professionals
Read More

Manuscript Manager 
Kultorvet 11, 2. floor
1175 Copenhagen K
Denmark

COMPANY

Manuscript Manager encourages customers and business partners to uphold high standards in peer review. Thus, we refer to the standards of DOAJ, COPE and OASPA, when considering partnerships.